Search Results

Abstract

Objetivo: Identificar tendências no campo de pesquisa da orbitopatia de Graves nas últimas duas décadas e analisar os ramos de maior concentração de pesquisas nessa área.
Métodos: O banco de dados Web of Science foi usado para extrair artigos com “orbitopatia de Graves” ou seus sinônimos no título. Dados completos e referências foram exportados para o programa VOSviewer para serem analisados. Mapas e gráficos de visualização foram construídos a partir desses dados.
Resultados: Foram obtidos 1067 artigos sobre a orbitopatia de Graves a partir do banco de dados Web of Science. Os EUA ficaram em primeiro lugar em termos de número de publicações, seguidos pela Itália e pela República Popular da China. Dentre os autores, os artigos de Wiersinga WM tiveram o maior número de citações. Quanto às instituições, os artigos da Universidade de Amsterdã tiveram o maior número de citações, mas a Universidade de Pisa publicou o maior número de artigos. Dentre os periódicos, a revista Thyroid publicou o maior número de artigos. A análise de coautoria mostrou quatro agrupamentos de colaboração entre países. O primeiro agrupamento engloba países europeus; o segundo engloba os EUA, Brasil, Canadá, Coreia do Sul e Taiwan. A República Popular da China compreende um agrupamento por si só. O quarto agrupamento inclui Japão, Austrália e Polônia. A análise das palavras-chave revelou cinco agrupamentos de tópicos de palavras-chave: patogênese, gerenciamento, associação, qualidade de vida e cirurgia. A análise das referências citadas em conjunto revelou cinco agrupamentos: patogênese, manejo, fatores de risco, avaliação clínica e manejo cirúrgico.
Conclusão: A pesquisa no campo da orbitopatia de Graves cresceu nos últimos vinte anos. Os tópicos com a maior concentração de pesquisas são: patogênese, gerenciamento, fatores de risco, qualidade de vida e complicações. As tendências de pesquisa mudaram nas últimas duas décadas. Ficou evidente um aumento do interesse em explorar os mecanismos e associações da orbitopatia de Graves. Observou-se uma cooperação entre países europeus neste campo de pesquisa. Os EUA estabeleceram uma cooperação internacional mais ampla que outros países. Acreditamos que mais colaboração internacional envolvendo países em desenvolvimento seria recomendável.

Keywords: Oftalmopatia de Graves; Bibliometria; Oftalmopatia de Graves; Pesquisa

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify barriers to diabetic retinopathy screening among a socioeconomically vulnerable urban population in northeast Brazil.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted during a diabetic retinopathy screening campaign at primary healthcare units. Ninety-five patients with diabetes underwent retinal examinations and completed a structured interview. Clinical, demographic, and socioeconomic data were collected.
RESULTS: The study population consisted predominantly of older adults (mean age: 60.7 ± 10.5 years), with a high prevalence of type 2 diabetes (99.0%) and low educational attainment. Most participants were economically inactive (81.1%) and reported low income (83.2%). Diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy were highly prevalent, affecting 50.0% and 22.9% of participants, respectively. Longer duration of diabetes was significantly associated with greater awareness of diabetic retinopathy (p=0.035), higher HbA1c levels (p<0.001), and increased prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (p=0.013) and maculopathy (p=0.002). Notably, 33.3% of participants reported difficulties attending medical appointments for diabetes management. In addition, 78.1% experienced challenges scheduling ophthalmologic evaluations, and 76.3% reported that no ophthalmologist was available in their city through the public healthcare system. Financial constraints also limited adherence to recommended dietary practices (90.4%) and impaired glycemic control, with more than half of participants reporting difficulty maintaining target glucose levels.
CONCLUSION: Major barriers to diabetic retinopathy screening included limited awareness of the importance of screening, financial hardship, and transportation challenges. Targeted educational initiatives and structural interventions such as expanded screening programs incorporating telemedicine and subsidized transportation—may improve screening adherence among vulnerable populations.

Keywords: Diabetic retinopathy; Mass screening; Health services accessibility; Health knowledge, attitudes, practices; Socioeconomic factors

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify barriers to diabetic retinopathy screening among a socioeconomically vulnerable urban population in northeast Brazil.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted during a diabetic retinopathy screening campaign at primary healthcare units. Ninety-five patients with diabetes underwent retinal examinations and completed a structured interview. Clinical, demographic, and socioeconomic data were collected.
RESULTS: The study population consisted predominantly of older adults (mean age: 60.7 ± 10.5 years), with a high prevalence of type 2 diabetes (99.0%) and low educational attainment. Most participants were economically inactive (81.1%) and reported low income (83.2%). Diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy were highly prevalent, affecting 50.0% and 22.9% of participants, respectively. Longer duration of diabetes was significantly associated with greater awareness of diabetic retinopathy (p=0.035), higher HbA1c levels (p<0.001), and increased prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (p=0.013) and maculopathy (p=0.002). Notably, 33.3% of participants reported difficulties attending medical appointments for diabetes management. In addition, 78.1% experienced challenges scheduling ophthalmologic evaluations, and 76.3% reported that no ophthalmologist was available in their city through the public healthcare system. Financial constraints also limited adherence to recommended dietary practices (90.4%) and impaired glycemic control, with more than half of participants reporting difficulty maintaining target glucose levels.
CONCLUSION: Major barriers to diabetic retinopathy screening included limited awareness of the importance of screening, financial hardship, and transportation challenges. Targeted educational initiatives and structural interventions such as expanded screening programs incorporating telemedicine and subsidized transportation—may improve screening adherence among vulnerable populations.

Keywords: Diabetic retinopathy; Mass screening; Health services accessibility; Health knowledge, attitudes, practices; Socioeconomic factors

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify barriers to diabetic retinopathy screening among a socioeconomically vulnerable urban population in northeast Brazil.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted during a diabetic retinopathy screening campaign at primary healthcare units. Ninety-five patients with diabetes underwent retinal examinations and completed a structured interview. Clinical, demographic, and socioeconomic data were collected.
RESULTS: The study population consisted predominantly of older adults (mean age: 60.7 ± 10.5 years), with a high prevalence of type 2 diabetes (99.0%) and low educational attainment. Most participants were economically inactive (81.1%) and reported low income (83.2%). Diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy were highly prevalent, affecting 50.0% and 22.9% of participants, respectively. Longer duration of diabetes was significantly associated with greater awareness of diabetic retinopathy (p=0.035), higher HbA1c levels (p<0.001), and increased prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (p=0.013) and maculopathy (p=0.002). Notably, 33.3% of participants reported difficulties attending medical appointments for diabetes management. In addition, 78.1% experienced challenges scheduling ophthalmologic evaluations, and 76.3% reported that no ophthalmologist was available in their city through the public healthcare system. Financial constraints also limited adherence to recommended dietary practices (90.4%) and impaired glycemic control, with more than half of participants reporting difficulty maintaining target glucose levels.
CONCLUSION: Major barriers to diabetic retinopathy screening included limited awareness of the importance of screening, financial hardship, and transportation challenges. Targeted educational initiatives and structural interventions such as expanded screening programs incorporating telemedicine and subsidized transportation—may improve screening adherence among vulnerable populations.

Keywords: Diabetic retinopathy; Mass screening; Health services accessibility; Health knowledge, attitudes, practices; Socioeconomic factors