Open Access Peer-Reviewed
Artigo Original

Evaluation of corneal tomography in children and adolescents without ocular or systemic allergy

Avaliação da tomografia de córnea em crianças e adolescentes sem alergia ocular ou sistêmica

Roddie Moraes Neto1; Gabriel Bordignon1; Nayara Teixeira Flügel2; Vinícius Tadashi Okuyama2; Cristine Secco Rosário3; Crislaine Caroline Serpe2; Nelson Augusto Rosário Filho3; Herberto José Chong Neto3; Glauco Henrique Reggiani Mello2

DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.2021-0048


Purpose: To determine normal corneal tomographic parameters in children and adolescents without corneal disease or atopy diagnosis.
Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study evaluated patients aged 8-16 years who underwent a complete slit-lamp biomicroscopic examination and tomographic corneal evaluation by a dual Scheimpflug analyzer, excluding those with ocular disease (including allergic conjunctivitis) or a positive prick test for systemic atopies.
Results: A total of 170 patients were evaluated, and 34 patients (68 eyes) were analyzed once the exclusion criteria were applied. The sample’s mean age was 10.76 ± 2.31 years; with 19 (55.9%) men and 15 (44.1%) women. The mean keratometry in the flat meridian (Kflat), steep meridian (Ksteep), and maximum (Kmax) were 42.37 ± 1.63D, 43.53 ± 1.65D, and 43.90 ± 1.73D, respectively. The mean values for corneal asphericity (ε2) and thinnest point were 0.28 ± 0.11 and 550.20 ± 37.90 μm, respectively. The inferior-superior asymmetry ratio (I-S) and coma were 0.74 ±0.59D and 0.28 ± 0.12D, respectively.
Conclusion: The knowledge of normal corneal tomographic parameters and their variation in children and adolescents without corneal disease or atopy may be useful for diagnosing keratoconus and initiating early disease treatment.

Keywords: Cornea; Corneal topography; Astigmatism; Conjunctivitis; allergic; Tomography; Keratoconus/diagnosis; Humans; Child; Adolescent.


Objetivo: Identificar parâmetros tomográficos de normalidade em córneas de crianças e adolescentes sem a presença de atopias sistêmicas e alergias oculares.
Métodos: Este estudo descritivo transversal avaliou pacientes com idade entre 8 e 16 anos que foram submetidos a exame biomicroscópico completo por lâmpada de fenda e avaliação tomográfica da córnea por tomógrafo dual Scheimpflug, excluindo pacientes com doença ocular (incluindo conjuntivite alérgica) ou prick test positivo para atopias sistêmicas.
Resultados: Cento e setenta pacientes foram avaliados e após cumpridos os critérios de exclusão, 34 (68 olhos) foram analisados. A média etária da amostra foi 10,76 ± 2,31 anos; 19 (55,9%) eram meninos e 15 (44,1%) meninas. A média da ceratometria em dioptrias (D) no meridiano mais plano (Kflat), mais curvo (Ksteep) e máxima (Kmax) foram 42,37 ± 1,63D, 43,53 ± 1,65D e 43,90 ± 1,73D, respectivamente. Os valores médios da asfericidade corneana (ε2) e do ponto mais fino da córnea foram 0,28 ± 0,11 e 550,20 ± 37,90 micras (μm). A assimetria corneana inferior-superior (I-S) e coma foi em média 0,74 ± 0,59D e 0,28 ± 0,12D, respectivamente.
Conclusão: O conhecimento dos valores médios e sua variação de parâmetros tomográficos da córnea em crianças e adolescentes sem atopias sistêmicas ou alergias oculares pode ser útil para o diagnóstico precoce do ceratocone e o seu tratamento em estágio inicial.

Descritores: Córnea; Topografia corneana; Astigmatismo; Con­juntivite alérgica; Tomografia; Ceratocone/diagnóstico; Humanos; Criança; Adolescente.


Ectasias are corneal changes induced by structural weakening. Keratoconus, the most prevalent ectasia, is a bilateral, progressive, and asymmetric disorder asso­ciated with structural changes in the organization of corneal collagen. Classically, the disease manifests itself in the second decade of life, when the cornea assumes a more conical form, resulting in irregular astigmatism, progressive myopia, thinning of the cornea, and a concomitant decline in visual acuity(1).

Pediatric keratoconus is more aggressive than adult keratoconus because the young cornea is biomechanically less resistant, resulting in rapid progression of ectasia and a seven-fold increase in the need for corneal transplantation(2). In addition, the frequent coexistence of ocular pathologies, such as atopy and vernal keratoconjunctivitis, has been associated with faster progression and long-term keratoconus complications in children(1,3).

The study of corneal regularity can be carried out using Placido, Scheimpflug, or Optical coherence tomo­graphy images(4-6). The combination of Placido and Scheimpflug enables the detection of subtle changes in corneal conformation, regularity, and thickness, which is important for early diagnosis of keratoconus and other corneal ectasias(5-7).

Therefore, the knowledge of corneal topographic and tomographic parameters considered normal in children and adolescents without corneal disease or systemic atopy may be crucial in identifying subclinical changes in the cornea and helping in the early diagnosis and treatment of ectasias in young patients.



A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Hospital Universitário do Complexo Hospitalar das Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná (CHC-UFPR), Curitiba-PR-Brazil, from November 2018 to April 2019. This research was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of CHC-UFPR, under protocol no. 2855765. The ethical principles of privacy and confidentiality of the collected data were respected. All participants were minors and signed the informed assent form (TALE) and their respective parents signed the Informed Consent Form.

The inclusion criteria were patients aged 8-16-year-old referred to the ophthalmology and immunology outpatient clinics of CHC-UFPR between November 2018 to April 2019 and presented a standardized and reliable tomographic corneal examination, as recommended by the manufacturer. Exclusion criteria were: patients with allergy (positive prick test or allergy identified through the application of a previously validated questionnaire)(8), history of ocular surgery or corneal disease, patients with keratoconus diagnosed by tomography, presence of incomplete data or images with low-reliability index.

Two ophthalmologists from the CHC-UFPR performed a complete ophthalmologic examination in both eyes, which included slit-lamp biomicroscopy and corneal tomography using the Galilei G6 system (Zeimer Ophthalmic Systems AG, Port, Switzerland). Patients with any ophthalmologic abnormality who were referred to this research were directed to a specific ophthalmology specialist (GRM).

The tomographic data analyzed were as follows: a subjective evaluation by a single corneal specialist, keratometry in the flat and steep meridian and maximum keratometry (Kflat, Ksteep, and Kmax, respectively), asphericity (ε2), Corneal Thinnest Point (CTP), Keratoconus Probability Index (KPI), inferior-superior asymmetry ratio (I-S), Best-Fit Toric Aspheric at its maximum posterior elevation (BFTA/ MPE), Asphericity Asymmetry Index (AAI) or Kranemann-Arce Index, Cone Location and Magnitude Index (CLMI.x), best-fit sphere at its maximum posterior elevation (BFS MPE), the radius of the best-fit sphere (BFS MPE radius), and coma.

A single allergist specialist from the CHC-UFPR performed the allergic skin prick tests (SPT) - ALK Sterile Disposable, by FDA Allergenic® IMMUNOTECH - and the allergic questionnaire. The questionnaire has already been validated and is based on three modules (asthma, rhinitis, and atopic eczema)(9). Patients with more than three bouts of ocular itching in the previous year were judged to have allergic conjunctivitis(8). The tests were applied following the manufacturer’s instructions. The standardized FDA Allergenic® aeroallergens used were: two species of mites (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus 800 URC and Blomia tropicalis 800 URC), pollen mixture (grass pollen mix 400 μgP/mL), dog epithelium (Canis familiaris 400 μgP/mL), cat epithelium (Felis domesticus 400 μgP/mL), fungal mixture (Aspergillus fumigatus, Alternaria alternata 400 μgP/mL), and cockroaches (Periplaneta americana). The tested extracts were stored in FDA Allergenic® 2-mL vials and transported in a thermal container kept under refrigeration between 2 and 10°C.

To assess confidence level and relative error in the most important variables, a sample size determination for populational mean was undertaken. For Kmax, as an example, a sample size of 47 eyes was necessary to achieve 99% confidence level and 1.5% error, whereas, in corneal thinnest point, a sample size of 140 eyes was required to achieve the same confidence level and error. In addition, 51 eyes would give a 99% of confidence level and 2.5% of error in the latter.

Data were collected and organized in spreadsheets, processed, and compared using statistical software R (R Core Team, 2019)(10), version 3.6.1. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used for statistical analysis of all the obtained data. For non-normally-distributed variables, the p-value was <0.05 and represented by median and interquartile rate (IQR). For normally distributed variables, the p-value was >0.05.



A total of 170 patients were analyzed between November 2018 and April 2019. Of these, 12 were excluded because they presented low-reliability corneal tomographic indexes or incomplete data. Of the remaining 158 patients, 104 were then excluded due to the presence of allergic conjunctivitis and 20 due to systemic atopy.

Kmax, ε2, BFTA MPE, AAI, BFS MPE, and coma variables were normally distributed. Kflat, Ksteep, CTP, KPI, I-S, and BFS radius were non-normally distributed and repre­sented by median and IQR.

The final sample included 68 eyes of 34 patients who did not present any abnormalities in the biomicroscopic examination and corneal tomography. Figure 1 presents the sample’s gender and age distribution. The mean age was 10.76 ± 2.31 years, ranging from 8 to 16 years, and male participants represented 55.9% of those evaluated.


Figure 1. Relative frequency distribution of sample’s age and gender (n=34 patients).


Table 1 shows the tomographic parameters. For normally distributed variables, the median, mean ±standard deviation (SD), and range of variation are used, whereas, for non-normally distributed variables, the median and IQR are used. Regarding the corneal topographic pattern, it was observed that 16 (25%) of the 68 eyes analyzed had superior corneal asymmetry. Only one eye showed an abnormal CLMI index result, while another was considered borderline.



Figure 2 summarizes the keratometry data of the 68 eyes analyzed. Kflat, Ksteep and Kmax in diopters (D) were 42.37 ± 1.63 (range: 37.07-45.43), 43.53 ± 1.65 (range: 39.17-46.52), and 43.90 ± 1.73 (range: 39.60-47.63), respectively.


Figure 2. Keratometry frequency distribution (n=68 eyes).


The observed asphericity was 0.28 ± 0.11 (range: 0.03-0.61), with 66.2% of the evaluated eyes having values between 0.2 and 0.4 (Figure 3).


Figure 3. Asphericity frequency distribution (n=68 eyes).


The mean CTP was found to be 550.20 ± 37.90 μm in the analysis of corneal thinnest point (range: 462-612). It was observed that 64.7% of the patients were between 540 and 599 μm (Figure 4).


Figure 4. Corneal thinnest point frequency distribution (n=68 eyes).



Visual impairment in young individuals can have a severe influence on their social development, lowering their quality of life and subsequently their functional activity. Since pediatric corneas progress quickly to ectasia, delaying therapy owing to a difficult early keratoconus diagnosis may worsen the prognosis(1).

For many years, penetrating keratoplasty was the sole therapeutic option for patients who experienced intolerance or low visual acuity with the use of contact lenses or glasses. However, in recent decades, several techniques, such as intrastromal corneal rings and crosslinking(3), have been created and refined in an attempt to increase visual acuity and disease stability.

Patients deemed normal in the present study had an allergic skin prick test and a questionnaire that were both negative for the existence of atopy (allergic conjunctivitis, asthma, rhinitis, and atopic eczema). Since atopy was identified as one of the factors responsible for the chronic habit of eye rubbing, which is known as a risk factor for the development and progression of keratoconus, this patient selection was critical(11).

Tomographic data, such as that supplied by dual Scheimpflug technology, greatly improve the screening of corneal ectasias. Tomography, in addition to the previous topography corneal analysis, provides information on the posterior cornea, elevation, and pachymetric distribution maps, which can increase the ability to identify early and subtle changes(12).

The findings of this study were compared to those of previous studies in pediatric and adult populations(12-21). This data comparison between adults and pediatrics is possible since there are few studies in the pediatric population and because children’s corneal curvature reaches a similar pattern to adults around the age of three (22). The current study’s population includes children and teenagers aged 8 to 16, allowing for this comparison.

Keratometric parameters (Kflat, Ksteep, and Kmax) were similar to those reported in previous studies in pediatric(12,13) and adult populations(14,15) using different tomographic systems (Table 2). When compared to the adult population, our values are lower, which is in accordance with the literature, considering that keratometric values tend to increase with age and go through changes due to genetic and environmental conditions(23,24).



The CTP, KPI, AAI, coma, asphericity (ε2), I-S, BFS radius, and BFS MPE obtained were compared to other studies as shown in Tables 3 and 4, with each study including a description of the equipment used.

The inferior-superior asymmetry ratio, asphericity (ε2), and BFS radius were all identical to those observed in prior adult population investigations. The asphericity (Table 3) can aid in the early diagnosis of keratoconus, and Galilei measurements may be reliable, particularly in keratoconic eyes(25). The I-S index (Table 4) has ar numerical range that is similar to that of children (in this study) and adults(16,17), indicating that this is a less parameter throughout life. The BFS radius (Table 4) exhibits the same behavior, but with a more restricted numerical range when comparing children and adult populations, indicating an even more stable parameter(16).





There was no difference in the CTP (Table 4) when compared to prior research with pediatric(12) and adult populations(17,20). This parameter is important for differentiating normal corneas from keratoconus ones since it causes progressive thinning (17). Feng et al. conducted a multicenter study in adult patients, including Brazil, to evaluate the thinnest point of the cornea, and the mean value observed in Brazil was 533 μm, with a variation between 459 (-2SD) and 607 μm (+2SD)(26).

The KPI is considered normal when <10%(26); subclinical keratoconus has usually KPI from 10 to 30% and the keratoconus KPI is superior to 30%(16,21). The present study obtained similar values to adult population studies(16,21) (Table 4).

The AAI <21.5 μm is considered normal(26). Only one of the 68 eyes examined had an AAI of 22 (Table 4). This parameter is an essential screening tool for the keratoconus subclinical form(17). Regarding coma (Table 3), the values found in the present study were similar to values found by Cakir et al.(18).

The elevation indices BFS and BFTA cannot be used interchangeably. BFS MPE values were determined to be within normality and in agreement with the study conducted in an adult population by Smadja et al.(19) (Table 4). The values considered normal were <14 μm, which can help distinguish between corneas with unspecific topographic irregularities and those with subclinical keratoconus.

The BFTA MPE results (Table 4) are primarily utilized to distinguish between the normal cornea, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus. Through the BFTA MPE, a cutoff value was established: >13 μm for subclinical keratoconus and >16 μm for keratoconus(19). The present study obtained similar BFTA MPE values to those found in the study by Smadja et al.,(19) and 100% of the analyzed eyes had values within the normal range proposed. This suggests that the same BFTA MPE criteria could be also used in the pediatric population.

Superior corneal asymmetry is defined as the difference >1 D between 90° and 270° in the 3-mm zone(27). Rabinowitz et al.(28) described a superior asymmetry in 16 eyes (4.1%) in a study of 195 normal patients (390 eyes), which may be a typical finding of the topographic examination. Superior asymmetry was identified in 25% of the patients in this study, which contradicts the findings of the cited study. Superior asymmetry in the pediatric population deserves long-term follow-up since there is no consensus on its clinical significance. It is also necessary to prove that there is no structural weakness and that it might progress to inferior corneal asymmetry over time.

CLMI.x is formed by the application of the CLMI strategy (cone location and magnitude of the anterior surface) to not just the anterior axial curvature map, but also the pachymetric map, posterior elevation, and posterior curvature(29,30). According to previous studies, the range value defined for the diagnosis of normality is between 0 and 25, clinical suspicion is between 25 and 80 and keratoconus is between 80 and 100(29). Based on CLMI x, only one eye was considered keratoconus suspect, and one eye was considered keratoconic in the current investigation. Nevertheless, a CLMI.x limitation is that it was originally developed to distinguish keratoconus from normal eyes, and not to identify the subclinical form of keratoconus(30).

This study is one of the rare studies that indicate normal corneal parameters, acquired by a high-precision tomography system in children and adolescents, excluding those with positive allergy skin prick test and specific validated questionnaire. Thus, these parameters may be useful in the early diagnosis of subclinical keratoconus and other corneal ectasias. Nevertheless, more research is needed to evaluate tomographic indexes in a pediatric population with larger sample size, because for variables such as pachy thinnest, a larger sample size is required to get a higher level of confidence and a smaller error.



1. Burns DAR, Júnior DC, Silva LR, Borges WG. Tratado de pediatria. 4th ed. Barueri, SP: Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria: Manole; 2017.

2. Sarac O, Caglayan M, Uysal BS, Uzel AGT, Tanriverdi B, Cagil N. Accelerated versus standard corneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric keratoconus patients: 24 months follow-up results. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2018;41(5):442-7.

3. Taneja M, Ashar JN, Mathur A, Vaddavalli PK, Rathi V, Sangwan V, Murthy S. Measure of keratoconus progression in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis using scanning slit topography. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2013;36(1):41-4.

4. Ho YJ, Sun CC, Lee JS, Lin KK, Hou CH. Comparison of using Galilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer G4 and Barrett formula in predicting low cylinder preoperatively for cataract surgeries. Eur J Ophthalmol 2020;30(6):1320-7.

5. Salouti R, Nowroozzadeh MH, Zamani M, Fard AH, Niknam S. Comparison of anterior and posterior elevation map measurements between 2 Scheimpflug imaging systems. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35(5):856-62.

6. Oliveira CM, Ribeiro C, Franco S. Corneal imaging with slit-scanning and Scheimpflug imaging techniques. Clin Exp Optom 2011; 94(1):33-42.

7. Goebels S, Eppig T, Wagenpfeil S, Cayless A, Seitz B, Langenbucher A. complementary keratoconus indices based on topographical interpretation of biomechanical waveform parameters: a supplement to established keratoconus Indices. Comput Math Methods Med 2017;2017 Available from: (

8. Asher MI, Keil U, Anderson HR, Beasley R, Crane J, Martinez F, et al. International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC): rationale and methods. Eur Respir J 1995;8(3):483-91.

9. Rosário CS, Cardozo CA, Chong-Neto HJ, Chong-Silva DC, Riedi CA, Rosario-Filho NA. Entendendo a alergia ocular. Arq Asma Alerg Imunol [Internet] 2020;4(1):78-84.Disponível em: AAAI - Entendendo a alergia ocular Available from: ( [Citado; 2021 Jun 27].

10. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018 Available from: (

11. Najmi H, Mobarki Y, Mania K, Altowairqi B, Basehi M, Mahfouz MS, Elmahdy M. The correlation between keratoconus and eye rubbing: a review. Int J Ophthalmol 2019;12(11):1775-81.

12. Vieira M, Germano A, Zangalli C, Ferreira BG, Castro RS, Okanobo A, et al. Corneal evaluation in healthy Brazilian children using a Scheimpflug Topography System. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2017; 8(2):648.

13. Hashemi H, Pakzad R, Heydarian S, Yekta AA, Ostadimoghaddam H, Mortazavi M, et al. Keratoconus indices and their determinants in healthy eyes of a rural population. J Curr Ophthalmol 2020; 32(4):343-8.

14. Yağcı R, Kulak AE, Güler E, Tenlik A, Güragaç FB, Hepşen İF. Comparison of anterior segment measurements with a dual Scheimpflug Placido corneal topographer and a new partial coherence interferometer in keratoconic eyes. Cornea 2015;34(9):1012-8.

15. Ortiz-Toquero S, Zuñiga V, Rodriguez G, de Juan V, Martin R. Agreement of corneal measurements between dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido system and Placido-based topography device in normal and keratoconus eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016; 42(8):1198-206.

16. Feizi S, Yaseri M, Kheiri B. Predictive ability of galilei to distinguish subclinical keratoconus and keratoconus from normal corneas. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2016;11(1):8-16.

17. Smadja D, Touboul D, Colin J. Comparative evaluation of elevation, keratometric, pachymetric and wavefront parameters in normal eyes, subclinical keratoconus and keratoconus with a dual Scheimpflug analyzer. Int J Keratoconus Ectatic Corneal Dis 2012; 1(3):158-66.

18. Çakır B, Aksoy NÖ, Özmen S, Bursalı Ö, Çelik E, Horozoğlu F. Corneal topography, anterior segment and high-order aberration assessments in children with ≥2 diopter astigmatism. Int Ophthalmol 2020;40(6):1461-7.

19. Smadja D, Santhiago MR, Mello GR, Krueger RR, Colin J, Touboul D. Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2013;29(4):274-81.

20. Gomes BF, Santhiago MR, Kara-Junior N, Moraes HV. Evaluation of corneal parameters with dual Scheimpflug imaging in patients with systemic sclerosis. Curr Eye Res 2018;43(4):451-4.

21. Wang X, Dong J, Wu Q. Evaluation of anterior segment parameters and possible influencing factors in normal subjects using a dual Scheimpflug analyzer. PLOS ONE 2014;9(5):e97913 Available from: (

22. Fachinelli RL. Estimativa da ceratometria média a partir dos dados biométricos e refração pós-operatórios de olhos de crianças submetidas à facectomia por catarata congênita e do desenvolvimento [dissertação]. Botucatu: Universidade Estadual Paulista; 2018.

23. KhabazKhoob M, Hashemi H, Yazdani K, Mehravaran S, Yekta A, Fotouhi A. Keratometry measurements, corneal astigmatism and irregularity in a normal population: the Tehran Eye Study. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2010;30(6):800-5.

24. Hashemi H, Yekta AA, Shokrollahzadeh F, Aghamirsalim M, Ostadimoghaddam H, Hashemi A, et al. The distribution of keratometry in a population based study. J Curr Ophthalmol 2021;33(1):17-22.

25. Güler E, Yağci R, Akyol M, Arslanyılmaz Z, Balci M, Hepşen IF. Repeatability and reproducibility of Galilei measurements in normal keratoconic and postrefractive corneas. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2014;37(5):331-6.

26. Feng MT, Kim JT, Ambrósio R, Belin MW, Grewal SP, Yan W, et al. International values of central pachymetry in normal subjects by rotating Scheimpflug camera. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2012;1(1):13-8.

27. Rapuano CJ. Year Book Ophthalmol. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences 2013.

28. Rabinowitz YS, Yang H, Brickman Y, Akkina J, Riley C, Rotter JI, Elashoff J. Videokeratography database of normal human corneas. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80(7):610-6.

29. Mahmoud AM, Nuñez MX, Blanco C, Koch DD, Wang L, Weikert MP, et al. Expanding the cone location and magnitude index to include corneal thickness and posterior surface information for the detection of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;156(6):1102-11.

30. Duncan JK, Esquenazi I, Weikert MP. New diagnostics in corneal ectatic disease. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2017;57(3):63-74.

Submitted for publication: February 5, 2021.
Accepted for publication: March 13, 2022.

Approved by the following research ethics committee: Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná (CAAE: 95240618.2.0000.0096)

Funding: This study received no specific financial support

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest: None of the authors have any potential conflicts of interest to disclose


© 2024 - All rights reserved - Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia