Open Access Peer-Reviewed
Artigo Original

Comparison of surgically induced astigmatic changes after cataract surgery in post-laser in situ keratomileusis corneas versus virgin eyes

Comparação de alterações astigmáticas induzidas cirurgicamente após cirurgia de catarata em córneas ceratomileusis in situ pós-laser versus olhos virgens

Melisa Zisan Karslioglu1; Cem Kesim1; Ayse Yildiz Tas2; Murat Hasanreisoglu2; Orkun Muftuoglu2; Afsun Sahin2

DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20230070


Purpose: Postoperative refraction in modern mi­croincision cataract surgery gained extra importance in patients with the previous laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery. The surgically induced astigmatic changes in those eyes may differ not only in magnitude but also in direction compared to virgin corneas. This study aimed to compare the surgically induced astigmatic changes after microscopic cataract surgery between post-LASIK corneas and virgin eyes.
Methods: Cases that underwent microincision cataract surgery in eyes with and without previous LASIK surgery were reviewed. The demographics, the axial length at cataract surgery, the central corneal thickness, spheric and cylindric values, keratometry readings, and postoperative posterior corneal astigmatism were retrospectively evaluated. A modified Alpins method was used for astigmatic vector analysis, and baseline astigmatism, surgically induced astigmatism, difference vector, flattening effect, and torque were assessed.
Results: A total of 42 eyes from 24 subjects was evaluated. Group I consisted of 14 eyes with the previous LASIK, and Group II included 28 eyes without any refractive surgery. Preoperative mean central corneal thickness in Group I was significantly thinner (p=0.012). There was no significant difference in baseline astigmatism between the groups regarding magnitude and power vectors. After microincision cataract surgery, there were no significant differences in mean spheric and cylindric values and mean keratometry readings (all p>0.05). However, surgically induced astigmatism and difference vector were significantly higher on J45 vector component in post-LASIK eyes and microincision cataract surgery steepening effect on post-LASIK corneas was significantly higher than those in virgin eyes (p=0.001, p=0.002 and p=0.018, respectively).
Conclusions: Cataract surgery has steepened the corneas in both groups with a significantly higher steepening effect in post-LASIK eyes. Certainly, corneal topography cataract surgery is particularly helpful to provide more precise surgically induced astigmatism interpretations.

Keywords: Cataract surgery; Keratomileusis; laser in situ; Refractive surgery; Surgically induced astigmatism; Vector analysis.


Objetivo: A refração pós-operatória na cirurgia mo­derna de catarata por microincisão ganha ainda mais importância em pacientes com cirurgia prévia de ceratomileuse in situ assistida por laser (LASIK). As alterações astigmáticas induzidas cirurgicamente nesses olhos podem diferir não apenas em magnitude, mas também em direção em comparação com córneas virgens. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar as alterações astigmáticas induzidas cirurgicamente após cirurgia de catarata por microincisão entre córneas pós-LASIK e olhos virgens.
Métodos: Foi revisada uma série de casos de cirurgia de catarata por microincisão em olhos com e sem cirurgia LASIK anterior. Os dados demográficos, o comprimento axial no momento da cirurgia de catarata, a espessura central da córnea, os valores esféricos e cilíndricos, as leituras da ceratometria e o astigmatismo corneano posterior pós-operatório foram avaliados retrospectivamente. O método Alpins modificado foi usado para análise vetorial astigmática e foram avaliados o astigmatismo basal, o astigmatismo induzido cirurgicamente, o vetor de diferença, o efeito de achatamento e o torque.
Resultados: Ao todo, 42 olhos de 24 indivíduos foram avaliados. O Grupo I consistiu em 14 olhos com LASIK prévio; o Grupo II incluiu 28 olhos sem qualquer cirurgia refrativa. A média da espessura corneana central pré-operatória no Grupo I foi significativamente mais fina (p=0,012). Não houve diferença significativa no astigmatismo basal entre os grupos em termos de magnitude e vetores de potência. Após a cirurgia de catarata por microincisão, não houve diferenças significativas nos valores médios esféricos, cilíndricos e leituras médias de ceratometria (todos com p>0,05). No entanto, o astigmatismo induzido cirurgicamente e o vetor de diferença foram significativamente maiores no componente do vetor J45 em olhos pós-LASIK, e o efeito de aumento da inclinação pela cirurgia de catarata por microincisão nas córneas pós-LASIK foi significativo em comparação com olhos virgens (p=0,001, p=0,002 e p=0,018, respectivamente).
Conclusões: A cirurgia de catarata aumentou a inclinação das córneas em ambos os grupos, sendo esse aumento significativamente maior nos olhos pós-LASIK. Certamente, a topografia da córnea antes da cirurgia de catarata é particularmente útil para fornecer interpretações mais precisas do astigmatismo induzido cirurgicamente.

Descritores: Cirurgia de catarata; Ceratomileuse; excimer laser in situ; Cirurgia refrativa; Astigmatismo induzido cirurgicamente; Análise vetorial.


Refractive surgery has been performed on millions of people over the years. These patients underwent laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) to become as glasses-independent as possible. More and more such patients are now undergoing cataract surgery and expect the same visual freedom they had before the disease and surgery. One of the important parameters to ensure patient satisfaction is residual postoperative astigmatism. With premium intraocular lenses development, astigmatism management during cataract surgery gained more importance to meet patient expectations. It is well-known that residual astigmatism greater than 0.50 diopters after cataract surgery can reduce uncorrected visual acuity(1). Therefore, ophthalmologists should know surgically induced corneal changes after microincision cataract surgery. This becomes more important in patients who have undergone LASIK surgery.

Since LASIK was reported by Pallaris et al. in 1990(2), the patients who had undergone LASIK surgery have aged over the past 30 years(3), and cataract surgery became necessary. Unexpected refractive outcomes after cataract surgery in this population have presented a new challenge in postoperative definite refractive assessment because of their non-virgin corneas(4). A patient with high myopia who has also had LASIK still has high myopia anatomy, although he or she no longer has the refractive high myopia error. This introduces several complicating factors, including axial length measurement errors, intraocular lens power calculation formula errors, intraoperative reverse pupillary block, and greater corneal and scleral elasticity. As the eye wall tends to be more elastic, extreme care must be taken when making a clear corneal incision.

Corneal biomechanics after refractive surgeries may be unpredictable and has not been fully understood. Therefore, we hypothesize that corneal astigmatism changes can differ from the changes in virgin eyes after cataract surgery.

This study aimed to investigate whether the previous refractive surgery has a different effect on refractive rehabilitation in eyes after cataract surgery. By using modified astigmatic vector analysis, we analyzed the surgically induced astigmatic changes not only in magnitude but also in direction to compare these parameters in post-LASIK corneas versus virgin eyes after cataract surgery, contributing to the current literature.



Patient population

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of Koc University Committee on Human Research (No 2020. 295.IRB1.103) and conforms with the principles and applicable guidelines for protecting human subjects in biomedical research. Between September 2019 and December 2020, we reviewed consecutive cases of microincision cataract surgery in the eyes that had undergone LASIK surgery before. The demographics, including age and sex, the axial length at cataract surgery, the central corneal thickness, spheric and cylindric values, and keratometry readings were retrospectively evaluated. We also calculated the posto­perative posterior corneal astigmatism by subtracting corneal astigmatism from the total actual astigmatism, assuming that the lens-induced astigmatism was zero after cataract surgery. An autorefractometer and a partial coherence laser interferometry were used in recording axial length, central corneal thickness, keratometry readings, and corneal astigmatism.

Surgical technique in phacoemulsification

All surgeries were performed by a single right-handed surgeon under topical proparacaine hydrochloride anesthesia. After phacoemulsification, acrylic hydrophilic foldable intraocular lenses were implanted. Following his habits, the surgeon sit at the 9 o’clock position for the right eyes and at the 3 o’clock for the left eyes. The two-side ports were made with 20-gage angled side-port blades at 90º to the planned main clear corneal incision in both eyes at 12 and 6 o’clock. A main clear corneal three-planar horizontal incision of about 1 mm inside the limbus was made with a 2.2-mm diamond knife. The divide and conquer approach technique was used for nuclear fragmentation, and the rest of the surgical steps were performed as in routine phacoemulsification. The patients were recommended the same topical antibiotic eye drops (moxifloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution 5 times daily for 7 days) and topical steroid eye drops (dexamethasone 0.1% 5 times daily for a month) for the postoperative treatment.

Astigmatic vectorial analysis

We used a modified Alpins method for astigmatic vector analysis and defined the vectorial parameters used in the calculation for analysis as follows.

(i) the baseline astigmatism (BA): the astigmatic value that was present before surgery,

(ii) the surgically induced astigmatism (SIA): the astigmatic change that was induced in reality,

(iii) the difference vector (DV): remaining astigmatism and the summary of the astigmatic error considering both magnitude and axis,

(iv) the flattening effect (FE): the force that lies on the intended axis without rotating effect, which might have flattening (­) or steepening (+) effect,

(v) the torque (TRQ): the force that lies at 45 degrees to that intended axis which is ineffective in reducing pre-existing corneal astigmatism and might be clockwise or counterclockwise. The magnitudes of meridional and torsional components of each astigmatic vector are given as J0 and J45 power vectors as proposed by Thibos et al.(5) J0 is local astigmatism at 0 and 90 degrees, and J45 is local astigmatism at 45 degrees and 135 degrees.

Even though most of the patients could not remember the exact date of their previous LASIK surgery, the time they reported was more than 25 years. Therefore, we could not reach the keratometric data before the refractive surgery. Our study assumed the current data before cataract surgery as the baseline for post-LASIK eyes. The BAs, the SIA, the DV, the FE, and the torque(6) of the astigmatism were assessed in both post-LASIK corneas and virgin eyes after microincision cataract surgery. A negative value for the FE indicated that the vector of SIA flattened the BAs. In contrast, a positive value showed that the vector of SIA steepened the BAs.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences statistical software version 22. One-way analysis of variance and Pearson’s chi-squared test were used for categorical variants. Other values were reported as mean ± standard deviation, and Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for continuous variables. All p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant (p<0.05).



A total of 42 eyes from 24 subjects was included in the study. While Group I consisted of 14 post-LASIK eyes, Group II included 28 virgin eyes who underwent cataract surgery. The mean age at cataract surgery in Group I and II was 67.9 ± 8.6 years and 64.4 ± 7.6 years, respectively (p=0.120). There was no significant difference between the groups regarding sex (female: male ratio in Group I, 4:3; in Group II, 7:10, p=0.125).

The preoperative and postoperative data of the eyes in the two groups are shown in table 1 and table 2, respectively. There were no significant differences in preoperative mean axial length, spheric and cylindric values, and mean keratometry readings (all p>0.05, Table 1), and as expected, the preoperative mean central corneal thickness in Group I was significantly thinner than those in Group II (527 ± 25 μm and 555 ± 40 μm, respectively, p=0.012, Table 1).





After microincision cataract surgery, there were no significant differences in postoperative mean spheric and cylindric values and mean keratometry readings (all p>0.05, Table 2). The postoperative posterior corneal astigmatism was higher in post-LASIK eyes; however, the difference was not statistically significant between the groups (p=0.769, Table 2).

The vector analysis results between the two study groups, including the mean BAs, SIA, DV, FE, and torque are shown in table 3. There was no significant difference in BAs between the groups regarding magnitude and power vectors. However, the SIA and DV were significantly higher on the J45 power vector component in post-LASIK eyes than those in virgin eyes (p=0.001 and p=0.002, respectively, Table 3). The positive values of the FE showed that the cataract surgery had steepened the BAs in both groups, with a significantly more steepening effect in post-LASIK eyes (p=0.018, Table 3).





Generally, all cataract and refractive surgeries aim not only to treat patients but also to achieve better well-being. However, a satisfying visual rehabilitation may be difficult to achieve in these surgeries where too many variable factors are involved. In this study, we found that post-LASIK patients who underwent cataract surgery had higher SIA than the control group. Also, we revealed that having cataract surgery provided a higher steepening effect in post-LASIK corneas compared to virgin eyes.

SIA is considered one of the challenging factors in postoperative visual rehabilitation. It is defined as the difference between preoperative and postoperative astigmatism and can also be used in manifest refraction and corneal analysis(7). In other words, it is an astigmatism variant caused by the healing and scar formation occurring at the incision site(6). Many different factors playing a role in SIA formation have been investigated in the literature. Theodoulidou et al. evaluated the surgeon factor in cataract surgery with phacoemulsification and compared SIA between four different experienced surgeons performing the same main 3-step clear corneal incision in 3-mm width and a side-port incision in 1-mm width(8). SIA was calculated by vector analysis via the Alpins method(9). The authors found no significant difference in SIA among surgeons. Thus, they declared that SIA might be more related to preoperative keratometric values and incision characteristics instead of surgeon factor. In our study, the same surgeon performed all surgeries; thus, the surgeon factor was excluded. However, although the comparison of preoperative keratometric readings and corneal incisions was statistically insignificant between the groups, the significant difference in SIA found among our study participants directed us to focus on prior LASIK surgery.

Differently, Ferreira et al. compared SIA, the FE of wound healing, and the torque of astigmatism caused by femtosecond laser and manual clear corneal incisions(6). Alpins method was used for astigmatic vector analysis, similar to our study(9). Although femtosecond laser clear corneal incisions showed more reproducible standardized architecture, more precise location, less wound deformation, less endothelial damage, and smaller SIA, no significant difference was identified between femtosecond laser and manual clear corneal incisions in their study. The main outcomes evaluated in our study were nearly similar to those in Ferreira’s study. We concluded that significant differences in SIA and FE in our results were secondary to structural corneal changes due to previous LASIK surgery because cataract surgeries were performed by the same surgeon with the same incision preference and habit.

Previously, in a randomized controlled clinical trial, the torque and FE of temporal and on-axis clear corneal incisions in phacoemulsification were compared by Borasio et al.(10) using the Alpins method. In the eyes with preoperative astigmatism below 2.60 diopters, the temporal clear corneal incisions were associated with lesser torque and induced less FE in postoperative astigmatism compared to on-axis clear corneal incisions. In our study, all eyes had undergone temporal clear corneal incisions. Also, no significant difference was found regarding torque between the study groups; however, a greater steepening effect was calculated in the post-LASIK eyes.

Our study also evaluated posterior corneal astigmatism, which is astigmatism that compensates for 31%(11) of anterior corneal surface astigmatism. In a retrospective series including 132 eyes, Park et al.(12) evaluated not only the torque and FE of steep meridian incisions but also the effect of preoperative posterior corneal astigmatism on postoperative total corneal astigmatism after cataract surgery. The authors found that in eyes with greater posterior corneal with-the-rule astigmatism and greater superior corneal thickness, steep meridian incisions may cause a significant torsional effect and make the posterior cornea more against-the-rule astigmatic via shifting the steeper axis. Differently, in our study, temporal incisions were performed in all eyes, and although the difference was insignificant, postoperative posterior corneal astigmatism was greater in post-LASIK corneas. SIA was also higher in magnitude, and a significant shift toward the oblique axes was observed in post-LASIK eyes compared to virgin eyes after cataract surgery. We thought that these findings might be caused by corneal integrity disruption induced by previous corneal refractive surgery.

However, Zhang et al.(13) investigated the displacement in the posterior corneal surface shape after LASIK and, on the contrary, reported that this was a time-dependent process; in other words, the posterior corneal surface returned to untouched state 6 months after the surgery. Bao et al.(14) also investigated regional corneal changes after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK and stated that the changes differed in different regions (central, pericentral, and peripheral). Similar to the study of Zhang et al.(13), during the 6-month follow-up, they reported that these changes also tended to reverse, but they highlighted that posterior corneal astigmatism remained stable. Supporting those findings, in our study, although the postoperative posterior corneal astigmatism was higher in post-LASIK eyes, no significant difference was found between the study groups. This might be because our patients had undergone refractive surgery approximately 25 years ago and both mean keratometric readings and autorefractive values were statistically insignificant before the cataract surgery.

In the light of previous studies, it has been proven that the corneal biomechanical strength deteriorates after refractive surgery and corneal hysteresis decreases(15). Denoyer et al. stated that the elasticity modulates the optical quality together with wound healing corneal response after cataract surgery(16). The incision architecture, optical analysis of astigmatism with high-order aberrations, and biomechanical changes were assessed by spectral-domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography, Scheimpflug topography, and ocular response analyzer, respectively, in their study. The authors identified lower final SIA in patients with higher preoperative corneal hysteresis despite a large incision. In comparison, higher final SIA was found in patients with lower preoperative corneal hysteresis despite a microincision. Since corneal hysteresis has proven to decrease following LASIK(17) and SIA has been negatively correlated with corneal hysteresis, in accordance with the literature, a significant increase in the SIA was calculated in post-LASIK corneas compared to virgin eyes in our study.

Our study has a few limitations. First, a relatively small sample was studied. This was because there were relatively few cataractous post-LASIK eyes in the population. The second limitation was the absence of preoperative corneal topography imaging in some participants because our study is retrospective, and corneal topography imaging before cataract surgery was not routinely applied in our clinical practice unless toric intraocular lens implantation was planned. Another drawback was that the patients were further examined to understand corneal biomechanics regarding corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor.

Nevertheless, this study showed that SIA calculated after microincision cataract surgery was higher in post-LASIK corneas and cataract surgery had a higher steepening effect on post-LASIK corneas compared to virgin eyes.



1. Day AC, Dhariwal M, Keith MS, Ender F, Perez Vives C, Miglio C, et al. Distribution of preoperative and postoperative astigmatism in a large population of patients undergoing cataract surgery in the UK. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103(7):993-1000.

2. Pallikaris IG, Papatzanaki ME, Stathi EZ, Frenschock O, Georgiadis A. Laser in situ keratomileusis. Lasers Surg Med. 1990;10(5):463-8.

3. Iijima K, Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, Komatsu M. Demographics of patients having cataract surgery after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(2):334-8.

4. Cao D, Wang L, Koch DD. Outcome of toric intraocular lenses implanted in eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(4):534-9.

5. Thibos LN, Horner D. Power vector analysis of the optical outcome of refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(1):80-5.

6. Ferreira TB, Ribeiro FJ, Pinheiro J, Ribeiro P, O’Neill JG. Comparison of Surgically Induced Astigmatism and Morphologic Features Resulting From Femtosecond Laser and Manual Clear Corneal Incisions for Cataract Surgery. J Refract Surg. 2018;34(5):322-9.

7. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Randleman JB. JRS standard for reporting astigmatism outcomes of refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2014; 30(10):654-9.

8. Theodoulidou S, Asproudis I, Athanasiadis A, Kokkinos M, Aspiotis M. Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism among different surgeons performing the same incision. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017; 10(6):1004-7.

9. Alpins N. Astigmatism analysis by the Alpins method. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(1):31-49.

10. Borasio E, Mehta JS, Maurino V. Torque and flattening effects of clear corneal temporal and on-axis incisions for phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(12):2030-8.

11. Dubbelman M, Sicam VA, Van der Heijde GL. The shape of the anterior and posterior surface of the aging human cornea. Vision Res. 2006;46(6-7):993-1001.

12. Park Y, Kim HS. Torsional and flattening effect on corneal astigmatism after cataract surgery: a retrospective analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17(1):10.

13. Zhang L, Wang Y. The shape of posterior corneal surface in normal, post-LASIK, and post-epi-LASIK eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(7):3468-75.

14. Bao F, Cao S, Wang J, Wang Y, Huang W, Zhu R, et al. Regional changes in corneal shape over a 6-month follow-up after femtosecond-assisted LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(6):766-77.

15. Guo H, Hosseini-Moghaddam SM, Hodge W. Corneal biomechanical properties after SMILE versus FLEX, LASIK, LASEK, or PRK: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019; 19(1):167.

16. Denoyer A, Ricaud X, Van Went C, Labbé A, Baudouin C. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on surgically induced astigmatism in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013; 39(8):1204-10.

17. Kirwan C, O’Keefe M. Corneal hysteresis using the Reichert ocular response analyser: findings pre- and post-LASIK and LASEK. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008;86(2):215-8.

Submitted for publication: September 27, 2021.
Accepted for publication: December 13, 2021.

Approved by the following research ethics committee: Koc University (# 2020.295.IRB1.103).

Funding: This study received no specific financial support.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest: None of the authors have any potential conflicts of interest to disclose.


© 2023 - All rights reserved - Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia