INTRODUCTION
Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare malignancy that accounts for 5.2% of all cutaneous and non-cutaneous melanomas(1), with a mean age-adjusted incidence in the United States of around 5.1 cases per million(2). Most ocular melanomas are of uveal origin, with the most common of these arising from the choroid(1). UM is one of the most deadly cancers; approximately 50% of patients die from liver metasta ses(3), and mortality has not changed over the last four decades despite many advances in treatment(2).
Inflammation and angiogenesis play an important role in the pathogenesis of cancer; indeed, they are considered to be hallmarks of cancer formation and progression(4). The cancer-related inflammatory milieu contains various inflammatory cells and pro-angiogenic and pro-inflammatory cytokines(4). In UM, the presence of inflammatory cells and the degree of inflammation within the tumor correlate with poor prognosis(5). Similar patterns are observed in breast cancer, where high tissue expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and microvessel density are poor prognostic factors(6), and in colorectal cancer, where systemic inflammation is associated with poor prognosis(7).
Due to this close relationship between inflammation, angiogenesis, and cancer, various anti-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory agents have been shown to be beneficial in the treatment of cancer. One such agent is nicotinamide (NIC), the amide form of niacin (vitamin B3), which is a water-soluble vitamin involved in many cellular processes, especially adenosine triphosphate production. It has been suggested that NIC may show an inhibitory effect on angiogenesis by acting on various enzymes involved in the synthesis of pro-angiogenic factors such as sirtuins and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase(8). When keratinocytes are irradiated with ultraviolet-B radiation, NIC reduces various pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α(9). In human umbilical vein endothelial cells, NIC derivatives have been shown to reduce VEGF-induced angiogenesis(10). Notably, NIC has been found to enhance the repair of irradiation-damaged DNA in normal skin melanocytes, suggesting it could be used for chemoprevention in skin melanoma(11).
These anti-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory properties of NIC make it a promising agent for cancer treatment or prevention(12), but its effects on human UM have not yet been determined. In this study, therefore, we tested the anti-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory effects of NIC on two human UM cell lines to establish whether it has the potential to prevent or treat this high-mortality cancer.
METHODS
Cell cultures
Two human UM cell lines were used: 92.1 and OCM-1, initially es tablished initially by Dr. Jager (at the University Hospital Leiden, The Netherlands) and Dr. Albert (University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA), respectively(13,14). The cells were cultured in 75-cm(2)flasks at 37°C in a 5% CO2-enriched atmosphere. The culture medium was GlutaMAX(r) (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Invitrogen), 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 1% fungizone (Invitrogen).
MULTIPLEX SANDWICH ELISA
For each cell line, approximately 300,000 cells were seeded into all wells of a six-well plate. After 24 hours, the supernatant was discarded from all the wells, and serum-free media (SFM) was added to starve to cells for a further 24 hours. After a total of 48 hours, SFM with 10 mmol/L NIC (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to three wells of the plate of each cell line. This concentration was chosen because it has been observed that the anti-inflammatory effect of NIC is dose-dependent between concentrations in blood of 2 to 40 mmol/L(15); in addition, this concentration had been used previously in the cell culture by Audrito, et al.(16). SFM without NIC was added to the remaining three wells of the plates for each cell line. After 48 hours, SFM with and without NIC for each cell line was collec ted into four tubes. Two different multiplex Quantibody(r) en zyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) arrays (QAH-ANG-1 and QAH-INF-1; RayBiotech Inc., Norcross, GA, USA) were run for both inflammation and angiogenesis.
ANGIOGENESIS ARRAY
The amounts of each of the various angiogenic factors produced by the cells were measured following the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, standard dilution curves were developed by diluting the lyophilized Cytokine Standard Mix to known concentrations of sample diluent provided in the Quantibody(r) Array Kit (RayBiotech). These diluted compounds were then applied to the array, whose glass surface contained bound antibodies specific to angiogenin, angiopoietin-2 (ANG-2), epidermal growth factor (EGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), leptin, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF-BB), placenta growth factor (PlGF), and VEGF. In addition, 100 µL from each of the four SFM tubes was applied to the array and, in a separate well, 100 µL of untreated SFM was applied to the array as a negative control. A second, biotinylated antibody was applied to the chambers of the slide and visualized with a laser scanner after adding a streptavidin-labeled fluorescent dye, thereby depicting fluorescence as a function of the concentration of pro-angiogenic factors. The array slide was then sent to the company (RayBiotech) for analysis.
RESULTS
Angiogenesis array: Seven pro-angiogenic factors (angiogenin, ANG-2, EGF, bFGF, HB-EGF, PlGF, and VEGF) were detected in the control samples for both UM cell lines. Following treatment with NIC, the OCM-1 cells showed a significant decrease in bFGF and PlGF levels. In the 92.1 cells treated with NIC, angiogenin, ANG-2, EGF, PlGF, and VEGF levels were significantly reduced (Table 1).
Factor | OCM 1 + control | OCM 1 + NIC | P value | 92.1 + control | 92.1 + NIC | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Angiogenin | 05701.5 | 05258.0 | <0.05 | 06966.1 | 05669.4* | <0.05 |
ANG-2 | 00667.0 | 00632.3 | <0.78 | 00766.7 | 00641.5* | <0.05 |
EGF | 00003.8 | 3.9 | <0.61 | 00010.3 | 6.9* | <0.05 |
bFGF | 01459.5 | 88.1* | <0.05 | 00282.9 | 00275.6 | <0.31 |
HB-EGF | 01060.4 | 00849.9 | <0.10 | 01156.3 | 01001.9 | <0.11 |
HGF | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
Leptin | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
PDGF-BB | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
PlGF | 00061.9 | 23.5* | <0.05 | 00199.3 | 00132.0* | <0.05 |
VEGF | 17698.3 | 15588.9 | <0.11 | 27494.3 | 24814.7* | <0.05 |
*values with statistical significance at P<0.05. Values in gray= below the limit of detection; ND= not detected; NIC= nicotinamide; ANG-2= angiopoietin-2; EGF= epidermal growth factor; bFGF= basic fibroblast growth factor; HB-EGF= heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor; HGF= hepatocyte growth factor; PDGF-BB= platelet-derived growth factor; PlGF= placenta growth factor; VEGF= vascular endothelial growth factor.
Inflammatory array: In both cell lines, only IL-8 and MCP-1 were detected under the control conditions. After treatment with NIC, both cell lines showed significantly lower levels of IL-8 and MCP-1 pro duction (Table 2).
Factor | OCM 1 + control | OCM 1 + NIC | P value | 92.1 + control | 92.1 + NIC | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IL-1a | ND | 00.9* | <0.16 | ND | 0.6* | <0.14 |
IL-1b | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
IL-4 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
IL-6 | 00.3 | 1.3 | <0.01 | ND | 1.2< | <0.00 |
IL-8 | 09.4 | 03.6* | <0.05 | 11.1 | 6.4* | <0.05 |
IL-10 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
IL-13 | 0.8 | 5.9* | <0.01 | ND | 3.5 | <0.00 |
MCP-1 | 40.6 | 20.3* | <0.05 | 80.7 | 50.3* | <0.05 |
INFδ | 00.5 | 2 | <0.13 | ND | 02.1< | <0.00 |
TNFα | 03.1 | 04.8* | <0.03 | ND | 02.7< | <0.00 |
*values with statistical significance at P<0.05. Values in gray: below the limit of detection. ND= not detected; NIC= nicotinamide; IL= interleukin; MCP= monocyte chemotactic protein; INF= interferon; TNF= tumor necrosis factor.
DISCUSSION
Because inflammation and angiogenesis are closely linked to the progression of melanoma(17), we evaluated the levels of various pro-an giogenic and pro-inflammatory cytokines secreted by two human UM cell lines after NIC treatment. Both showed a significant decrease in cytokine levels after treatment with 10 mmol/L NIC for 48 hours.
In the angiogenesis assay, we found that both VEGF and EGF sig ni ficantly decreased in the 92.1 cell line after NIC treatment. A me ta-a na lysis(18)showed VEGF expression to be significantly higher in UM patients than in matched controls; in addition, VEGF expression in tumors was higher in patients with poor prognostic factors such as age <50 years, scleral invasion, large tumors, and predominantly epi thelioid cell-type tumors. Conversely, EGF has been shown to raise transforming growth factor-β and to promote the epithelialme senchymal transition that leads to metastasis(19). Furthermore, targeting angiogenin has been found to reduce tumorigenesis and the me tastasis of bladder cancer cells in nude mice(20). In the present study, an giogenin decreased after NIC treatment in the 92.1 cell line, as did ANG-2, which shows great potential for anti-angiogenic therapy(21). Interestingly, when the OCM-1 cell line was treated with NIC, there was no significant decrease in VEGF or angiogenin, although near - significant reductions were observed. However, in the OCM-1 cells, NIC significantly downregulated bFGF, which is a factor of poor prognosis in breast cancer(22).
PlGF has been extensively studied and is currently being used in targeted therapy for various cancers, including medulloblastoma(23). Re markably, both of our cells lines showed significant decreases in this pro-angiogenic factor after NIC treatment. In addition, both cell lines showed somewhat lower HB-EGF levels after treatment, although these results were not statistically significant. HB-EGF is known to be a potent inducer of tumor growth and angiogenesis(24), and the HB-EGF pathway has recently been targeted as an alternative cancer treatment(25).
The effect of NIC on inflammation is controversial. In an endotoxe mia model, a concentration of 4 mmol/L NIC in human serum reduced the level only of IL-6, whereas at 40 mmol/L the levels of IL-1b, IL-6, and TNFα were significantly reduced(15). However, when healthy volunteers were treated with endotoxin, even a high oral dose of NIC did not affect the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines(26). This could be a limitation of the clinical application of NIC, or it may indicate the need for other methods of administration; further studies of this are needed with regard to UM and NIC.
Tumor-associated macrophages have previously been studied in cutaneous melanoma(27)and UM(28). They are necessary for angiogenesis as well as invasion, and they have been shown to have a strong correlation with mortality from metastases(29). In tumors, cytokines are responsible for macrophage recruitment and differentiation. In the present study, MCP-1, which is known to play a key role as a chemokine(29), decreased in our treated cells.
It has been shown that the UM microenvironment can activate IL-8 signaling, thereby promoting angiogenesis(30). As our results showed that NIC downregulates IL-8, applying NIC in an in vivosetting may reduce the angiogenesis required for UM growth. Furthermore, as the foremost prognostic indicator for UM is the largest tumor dimension, early treatment with NIC may have a profound effect on UM metastasis.
In chronic lymphocytic leukemia, it has been shown that, in culture, exposure to NIC was followed by a significant decrease in the enzymatic activity of sirtuin-1 (SIRT1)(16). Although we did not investigate the effects of NIC on SIRT1 in the present study, this is an interesting pathway that warrants further research as the majority of UM tumors express SIRT1(31). Patients with UM tumors negative for SIRT1 expression have been observed to develop metastasis at a greater rate than those exhibiting SIRT1 expression, in contrast to the expression of SIRT1 in other cancers, in which metastatic disease correlates with the upregulation of this deacetylase(31).
There were limitations to this study. For instance, we only studied two cell lines, which may not be representative of the entire disease spectrum. However, the two cell lines we chose are located at both ends of the malignant spectrum; one (92.1) has high metastatic and proliferative potential and the other (OCM-1) has low metastatic and proliferative potential. Results cannot be compared between the OCM-1 and 92.1 cell lines because of these different proliferation rates and metastatic potentials.
It is important to recognize that the present study only evaluated the secretion of pro- angiogenic and pro-inflammatory cytokines, and did not examine transcriptional changes in these proteins. The reason for this is that it has been well established that intercellular signaling is a key driver of angiogenic processes and tumor invasion in UM and other cancers. Primary UM is generally well diagnosed and managed clinically, and so the focus of this investigation was on processes that promote the establishment and growth of metastatic tumors.
Now that these results have demonstrated the effects of NIC on pro-angiogenic and inflammatory cytokines in vitro, further investigation should test different doses to determine the optimal doses for in vivomodels. In addition, the effects of NIC on cell proliferation and viability are unreliable because an in vitroangiogenic model is not yet available. The clinical utility of NIC should also be tested in UM animal models.
In conclusion, treatment with NIC resulted in a significant reduction in the levels of several pro-angiogenic cytokines in two human UM cell lines. NIC treatment also significantly reduced MCP-1 and IL-8 levels. These findings suggest that NIC has both anti-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory effects on UM cells, and provides the basis for further studies and the possible use of NIC as a therapeutic agent in UM.