INTRODUCTION
Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy (DS) is a glaucoma surgery that aims to minimize the complications of trabeculectomy (TRAB), which often arise due to penetration of the anterior chamber. Nevertheless, excessive cicatrization of the surgical site may also limit the success rates of DS(3). The fibrosis of subconjunctival tissues is considered to be the leading cause of failure of glaucoma surgery. This problem is mitigated by using mitomycin C (MMC) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as adjunctive treatments(1). However, complications frequently occur with these therapies, prompting investigation into alternative drugs for managing post-operative failure(1,2).
Therapies that have been investigated in an attempt to minimize the adverse effects of using MMC and 5-FU include the administration of bevacizumab [monoclonal antibody directed to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF); Avastin® Genentech, San Francisco, California, USA](4) and methylcellulose(5) into the subconjunctival space. Bevacizumab may enhance the outcomes of glaucoma filtration surgery because VEGF is not only involved in angiogenesis but has been shown to display direct activity on fibroblast-related healing processes(6). As a potential way to improve surgical success, prolonging the bioavailability of bevacizumab using slow delivery systems could result in improved outcomes compared with isolated bevacizumab eye injections. We have recently shown that using implants containing bevacizumab in an experimental glaucoma surgery is feasible, and has promising results(7). Based on the promising findings of using bevacizumab and methylcellulose compounds in glaucoma surgery, we evaluated the safety and feasibility of a bevacizumab-methylcellulose mixture (BMM) as an adjunct therapy to DS.
METHODS
This prospective non-randomized interventional case series followed the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local Research Ethics Committee (process # 5159/2009). Ten patients diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and indicated for glaucoma surgical treatment were included, and observed at the University Hospital of Ribeirão Preto Medical School.
The following diagnostic criteria were used to diagnose POAG: intraocular pressure (IOP) greater than 21 mmHg irrespective of medical treatment, typical glaucomatous changes in the optic disc, and reliable visual field defects compatible with glaucoma in the achromatic perimetry.
All patients who underwent surgery met the following inclusion criteria: age between 18 and 80 years, POAG diagnosis, confirmed evidence of the progression of glaucoma damage, and two IOP measurements higher than the individualized target IOP. Patients were excluded if they had other forms of glaucoma, previous glaucoma filtration surgery, rubeosis iridis, other severe retinal or corneal diseases, well-known history of adverse effects to bevacizumab, or were pregnant or breast feeding women. All patients underwent typical DS, with stripping of the external wall of Schlemm’s canal on the same day(7). At the end of the surgery, the patients received a 0.3 mL subconjunctival injection of BMM (bevacizumab 3.75 mg incorporated into 4% methylcellulose) at the surgical site by the same surgeon (MJLS). BMM was prepared by ultracentrifugation 24 h prior to surgery, in a local compounding pharmacy.
In order to detect free bevacizumab, five 0.5 ml samples of BMM were evaluated by size-exclusion high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using 50 µL of BMM with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min, at 72 h (Waters BioSuite 250, 5 µm, HR SEC - 7.8 × 300 mm, pH 7.4, absorbance at 279 nm)(8). A HPLC column was used in which the mobile phase comprised PBS at a pH of 7.4. An ultraviolet detector (model 2487, Waters, USA) was used at a wavelength of 279 nm, and the area under peak was used to determine the quantity of the drug in the test solution.
The following clinical outcomes were evaluated 6 months following surgery: IOP reduction (variation from pre- to post-operative average of three Goldmann tonometry readings taken between 08:00 h and 10:00 h), bleb’s morphology (using the Moorfields bleb grading system)(9), visual acuity (using charts with the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution notations, logMAR), corneal endothelial cell count (CECC; using specular microscopy, ROBO NSP-9900, Konan, Japan), and complications. Data was presented as median with 25th to 75th interquartile range (IR) for scores, and mean with standard deviation (SD) for numerical data. The paired Friedman test was used to compare the results (Prism 5.0a; GraphPad Software Inc., CA, USA), and a p-value of <0.05 was defined as significant.
RESULTS
Ten caucasian patients (six males and four females, with a mean age of 56.4 ± 12.7 years) completed the procedure and 6 month follow-up. At the end of the follow-up, a significant IOP reduction was observed (20.7 ± 5.5 mmHg pre-operative vs 10.4 ± 2.5 mmHg post-operative; -10.3 ± 5.4 mmHg, P<0.001), and all patients exhibited diffuse blebs with low degrees of vascularity [median scores, with IR in parentheses -central area: 3.0 (3.0 to 3.75); maximal area: 3.5 (3.0 to 4.0); height: 2.0 (2.0 to 2.75); and vascularity: 2.0 (2.0 to 3.0)]. No significant difference was observed between the mean best-corrected pre-operative visual acuity score and that evaluated at the last visit (0.10 ± 0.02 and 0.15 ± 0.03, respectively). CECC was 7.4% lower 6 months after surgery (2529 ± 464 cells vs 2341 ± 432 cells, P=0.008). No complications were observed throughout the duration of the study.
HPLC detected bevacizumab in BMM at a mean retention time of 6.98 min across the five samples evaluated at 72 h (mean of 75.1% of free drug), close to the well-defined peak of free bevacizumab at 7.01 min (Figure 1)(5) BMM could be observed in the bleb areas of all patients during the first week (Figure 2). The blebs remained expanded with the hyaline material, but the liquid interface of aqueous humor could not be visualized during the slit-lamp examination.
DISCUSSION
Here, we show that BMM is a safe, feasible system for the delivery of bevacizumab during the early post-operative period following DS. Our results suggest that bevacizumab is available at the surgical site for a longer period of time than that following simple subconjunctival injection of the antibody. Moreover, both bevacizumab and methyl-cellulose have previously shown benefits in terms of enhancing the healing process following glaucoma surgery(4,5); thus, delivering both compounds may increase the therapeutic effect.
We could not determine whether there was a synergistic effect between bevacizumab and methylcellulose in this study, but we believe that BMM may act as a slow delivery system for bevacizumab to the subconjunctival space, particularly during the first week post-surgery. The artificial expansion of bleb volume with this viscoelastic product may also contribute additional benefits, primarily in the first phase of the healing process(7).
Although CECC was significantly lower after surgery than before, this reduction was proportional to those reported in previous TRAB and DS studies(3,10). We speculate that the non-penetrating procedure performed in our cases may help in limiting permeation of BMM into the anterior chamber, and may explain the reduction observed in CECC.
The limitations of this study, which include the absence of a control group, a small number of patients, and a short post-surgery evaluation period, should be addressed by future long-term follow-up randomized controlled trials. Moreover, use of BMM may result in higher costs related to the surgical procedure, and could add potential unforeseen complications related to both bevacizumab and methylcellulose administration. However, all patients enrolled in this study displayed good surgical results, and no complications were observed. Thus, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of BMM should be further verified prior to establishing it as an adjunctive therapy to DS, or other penetrating glaucoma surgeries.