Search Results

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to report the histopathological and clinical features of the Marcus Gunn phenomenon and other similar conditions of upper eyelid misfiring.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with congenital ptosis with Marcus Gunn phenomenon who have undergone surgical repair over a period of 12 years and another two patients with upper eyelid misfiring in association with extraocular movements to identify their histopathological findings as subtypes representing ocular congenital cranial dysinnervation disorder.
RESULTS: Among 136 patients with congenital ptosis, 11 (8%) patients with Marcus Gunn phenomenon or misfiring were identified, of whom 9 (6.6%) had typical known Marcus Gunn phenomenon and 2 (1.4%) had eyelid misfiring similar to Marcus Gunn phenomenon. In all patients, the histopathological changes of the excised levator muscle included overall loss and/or atrophy of muscle fibers and irregular-modified Gomori trichrome staining.
CONCLUSION: The Marcus Gunn phenomenon and similar misfiring conditions with synkinetic extraocular muscle movements share findings that are consistent with the neurogenic type of muscle atrophy. This result suggests a common underlying etiology with variable clinical findings, representing the ocular counterpart of congenital cranial dysinnervation disorder, which has been reported as ocular congenital cranial dysinnervation disorder.

Keywords: Eyelid diseases; Ocular motility disorders/surgery; Ophthalmologic surgical procedures

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to study reported cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma presenting with ophthalmic manifestations with and without a prior diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE database in PubMed and Google Scholar. We included patients with a previous diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Group I and those without a prior diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Group II. Data included demographics, clinical presentation, history of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, treatment, histopathological description, World Health Organization classification, and outcome.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (26 in Group I and 32 in Group II) were included. The male-to-female ratio was 3:1. The mean age of the patients (53.3 ± 11.7 years and 54.8 ± 16.2 years, respectively) and gender did not differ significantly between the two groups. The most common ocular presentations were diplopia and proptosis in the first group (each in 34.6%), whereas visual disturbance was most common in the second group (46.9%). Treatment options and World Health Organization grading were comparable. The outcome in 38 patients (after a comparable follow-up period) was significantly better in group II (p=0.003). There was no statistically significant difference in the outcome of 23 patients in correlation with World Health Organization grades II versus III irrespective of group (p=0.094).
CONCLUSIONS: The demographics of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma presenting with ophthalmic manifestations were similar between the two study groups, with a wide age range and male predominance. Patients presenting initially to ophthalmologists with no history of nasopharyngeal carcinoma have a more favorable outcome. World Health Organization grading may have less value as a prognostic indicator.

Keywords: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; Carcinoma; Eye manifestations; Exophthalmos; Diplopia; Systematic review