Open Access Peer-Reviewed
Artigo Original

Three Decades of Contact Lens-associated Microbial Keratitis in a Referral Hospital in São Paulo, Brazil

Ceratite Microbiana Associada a Lentes de contato em um Hospital de Referência em São Paulo, Brasil

Jorge Agi; Talita Trevizani Rocchetti; Maria Cecília Zorat Yu; Michelle Lima Farah; Fabio Ramos; Denise de Freitas; Ana Luisa Höfling-Lima

DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20210079

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze patient data and the laboratory results of corneal samples collected from patients followed at the Ophthalmology Department, Hospital São Paulo, Brazil over a 30-year period, and correlate the analize with contact lens wearing.
Methods: Corneal samples from patients diagnosed clinically with microbial keratitis between January 1987 and December 2016 were included in this study. Cultures that were positive for bacteria, fungi, and Acanthamoeba spp. were analyzed retrospectively. To ascertain if the number of patients with contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis (as a risk factor for microbial infection) changed over time, the analysis was divided into three decades: 1987-1996, 1997-2006, and 2007-2016. Information pertaining to patient gender and age, as well as type of organism isolated, were compared among these periods.
Results: The corneal samples of 10.562 patients with a clinical diagnosis of microbial keratitis were included in the study, among which 1.848 cases were related to the use of contact lenses. The results revealed that the frequency of contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis increased over the last two decades. Overall, females had contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis more frequently (59.5%). Patients aged 19-40 years also had contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis more frequently in all study periods. Staphylococcus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. were the most frequent Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, respectively, in the microbial keratitis groups. Among the fungal cases of microbial keratitis, filamentous fungi were the most frequent fungi over the entire study period, with Fusarium spp. being the most frequent fungi in the group with microbial keratitis not associated with contact lens wearing (p<0.001). Samples positive for Acanthamoeba spp. and Pseudomonas spp. were significantly correlated with contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis (p<0.001).
Conclusions: Females and young adults aged 19-40 years exhibited the highest frequency of contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis in our study. Staphylococcus spp. and Fusarium spp. were the predominant bacteria and fungi, respectively, isolated from corneal samples. Pseudomonas spp. and Acanthamoeba spp. were significantly correlated with contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis in this study.

Keywords: Contact lenses/adverse effects; Eye infections, bacterial/ microbiology; Acanthamoeba keratitis; Corneal ulcer

RESUMO

Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar dados epidemiológicos de pacientes e resultados laboratoriais para todas as amostras de córnea coletadas de pacientes atendidos no Departamento de Oftalmologia do Hospital São Paulo, Brasil, durante um período de 30 anos e correlacionar com o uso de lentes de contato.
Métodos: Amostras de córnea de pacientes com diagnóstico clínico de ceratite microbiana (de janeiro de 1987 a dezembro de 2016) foram incluídas neste estudo. Resultados laboratoriais para culturas positivas para bactérias, fungos e Acanthamoeba spp. foram analisados retrospectivamente. Para verificar se o número de pacientes com ceratite microbiana associada à lente de contato, fator de risco para infecção microbiana, mudou ao longo do tempo, a análise foi dividida em três décadas: 1987-1996, 1997-2006 e 2007-2016. As informações incluindo o sexo do paciente, idade e tipo de organismo isolado foram comparadas entre os períodos. A análise estatística foi realizada no software SAS/STAT 9.3 e SPSS (v20.0).
Resultados: Amostras de córnea de 10.562 pacientes com ceratite microbiana foram incluídas no estudo, das quais 1.848 foram relacionadas ao uso de lentes de contato. Os resultados revelaram que a frequência de ceratite microbiana associada à lente de contato aumentou nas últimas duas décadas analisadas. No geral, os homens compreendiam uma proporção maior do grupo ceratite microbiana não associada à lente de contato (CMNLC) (60,3%) e as mulheres eram mais frequentes no grupo ceratite microbiana associada à lente de contato (59,5%). Pacientes com idade entre 19 e 40 anos foram mais frequentemente observados no grupo ceratite microbiana associada à lente de contato em todos os períodos. Staphylococcus spp. foi a bactéria Gram-positiva mais frequentes, enquanto Pseudomonas spp. foi a bactéria Gram-negativa nos grupos ceratite microbiana. Entre os fungos ceratite microbiana, os fungos filamentosos foram os fungos mais frequentes durante todo o período do estudo, com Fusarium spp. sendo o mais frequente no grupo ceratite microbiana não associada à lente de contato. Acanthamoeba spp. e Pseudomonas spp. amostras positivas foram significativamente correlacionadas com ceratite microbiana associada à lente de contato.
Conclusões: A maior prevalência de ceratite microbiana associada à lente de contato no nosso estudo foi observada em mulheres e adultos jovens com idade entre 19 e 40 anos. Staphylococcus spp. e Fusarium spp. foram as bactérias e fungos predominantes isolados nas amostras da córnea. Pseudomonas spp. e Acanthamoeba spp. foram significativamente correlacionados a ceratite microbiana associada à lente de contato neste estudo.

Descritores: Lentes de contato/efeitos adversos; Infecções oculares bacterianas/microbiologia; Ceratite por Acanthamoeba; Úlcera de córnea

INTRODUCTION

Microbial keratitis (MK) is an important cause of sight-threatening eye infection and is considered one of the leading causes of blindness in developing and developed countries(1). In India, approximately 2 million people develop corneal ulcers every year(2,3). In the United States, an estimated 30,000 cases of MK (including bacteria, fungi, and Acanthamoeba spp. related cases) are reported annually(4). Brazil is a large country with a variable incidence of MK because of geographical differences. In the Southeastern region of the country, the percentage of MK among the total number of eye infections followed at the Ocular Microbiology Laboratory, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP) is around 40%(5).

Contact lens (CL) wearing, trauma, corneal surgery, ocular surface disease (e.g., tear deficiencies), systemic diseases, and immunosuppression are potential risk factors for MK(6,7). With the increase in CL use, the impact of MK on eye health has become increasingly relevant. Risk factors for CL-associated microbial keratitis (CLMK) include overnight use of CLs, a higher number of days of use, male gender, younger age, inadequate cleaning of CLs, poor CL-storage and case-cleaning habits, and purchase via the internet(8-11). Regarding the daily wear of CLs, given the associated benefits of an absence of requirement for the use of storage cases or lens-cleaning solutions, it was hoped that infectious complications would be avoided. Unfortunately, daily use of disposable CLs remains a risk factor for MK. Although environmental microorganisms represent the largest group of causative organisms for MK, such organisms are detected less frequently among wearers of daily disposable CLs(12).

Typically, CLMK is related to bacterial infection(13); however, Acanthamoeba and, less frequently, fungi can also be involved in the pathological process of this condition. Gram-negative bacilli represent the major bacterial agents in this context, with Pseudomonas aeruginosa being reported most frequently in previous studies(8,10,14,15). The etiological agent that is usually responsible for MK varies according to geographical region(16).

The aim of this study was to analyze the epidemiological and microbiological sample data collected from patients who were clinically diagnosed with MK over a 30-year period (sent to the Laboratory of Ocular Microbiology, Hospital São Paulo, Brazil) and to correlate them with CL use.

 

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patient data and the laboratory results of corneal samples collected from patients who were followed at the Ophthalmology Department, Hospital São Paulo, Brazil. The analysis was divided into three 10-year periods (1987-1996, 1997-2006, and 2007-2016). The following data were examined: patient gender, age (classified as <18, 19-40, 41-60, and >61 years), CL wearing parameters, culture results (positive or negative), and etiological agents present in the samples (bacteria, fungi, and Acanthamoeba spp.).

Information about lens type, CL wearing modality, and CL hygiene was not evaluated in this study because of the difficulty of acquiring this information from clinical and laboratory medical records.

Scrapings were collected by a trained physician under slit-lamp visualization using a Kimura spatula and topical anesthesia. The material obtained from corneal scrapings was smeared onto two slides and stained with Giemsa and Gram stains. Corneal material was also added to thioglycolate (Thio) broth, brain heart infusion, and solid agar media (Sabouraud, blood, and chocolate). Additional slide staining- and/or culture media-related procedures were performed depending on the clinical suspicion. Non-nutrient agar with an overlay of Escherichia coli medium, for example, was always used when Acanthamoeba spp. infection was clinically suspected. All scrapings were performed according to the standard protocol of the Microbiology Ocular Laboratory, Hospital São Paulo. A positive result was determined according to Stapleton et al.(12): “an organism was identified on more than one medium or on one solid medium with organism having the same morphology as the organism visualized in the corneal scrape by staining methods”. If the organism was recovered from only one medium and/or after long periods of incubation, the result was considered negative(12).

Statistical analysis was performed via the Cochran-Armitage test to evaluate the existence of a trend in CLMK percentage among the three decades, using the SAS/STAT 9.3 software (SAS Institute Inc. 2011b); and by the chi-squares or Fisher’s exact test using the SPSS for Windows software (ver. 20.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A significance level of 5% was used for all statistical tests.

 

RESULTS

We analyzed the corneal scrapings from 10.562 patients who received a clinical diagnosis of MK from January 1987 to December 2016. Among these patients with keratitis, 1.848 (17.5%) had CLMK. During the three periods analyzed, the incidence of MK and CLMK increased; however, the increase in CLMK was statistically significant from the first to the second decade, from 7.3% to 19.6% (p<0.001) (Table 1). The increase in MK positivity was accompanied by an increase in culture requests at our Medical Center.

 

 

The positivity for bacteria and fungi in cultures increased in the MK and CLMK groups during the three decades analyzed. Among the MK positives samples that were positive for Acanthamoeba spp., 100% (13/13) of cases belonging to CLMK group in the first decade, 90% (197/218) in the second decade, and 87.6% (162/185) in the third decade (Table 2).

 

 

The incidence by gender differed between the MK and CLMK groups, as males were more frequent in the non-CL-associated MK (NCLMK) group (60.3%) and females were more frequent in the CLMK group (59.5%) (p<0.001). The incidence of CLMK increased in all four age groups between 1987 and 2016, with the incidence being highest among individuals aged 19-40 years for all three decades analyzed (55.2%, 64.1%, and 58.6%, respectively).

Staphylococcus spp. was the most frequent Gram-positive bacterium isolated from samples from both the NCLMK and CLMK groups. Among Gram-negative bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. was most frequently isolated from samples of both groups. Among Staphylococcus spp., S. aureus was the most frequently isolated agent from NCLMK (49.5%) and CLMK (45.7%) samples in the first period (1987-1996). However, in the second and third periods (1997-2006 and 2007-2016, respectively), coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) was the most commonly isolated bacteria from the NCLMK group (36.2% and 51.6%, respectively) and the CLMK group (45.2% and 57.4%, respectively). Streptococcus spp. was more frequent in the NCLMK group compared with the CLMK group in the second and third periods (p<0.001). Pseudomonas spp. was more common in the CLMK group in the first and second periods (p<0.001) (Table 3).

 

 

Among all positive fungal cultures, filamentous fungi were the most frequent in all three periods for the MK group. Fusarium spp. was the most common filamentous species isolated from the NCLMK group for all three periods (>70%; p<0.001). Candida albicans was the most frequent yeast species isolated from the NCLMK group samples in the second period (p<0.001), which C. parapsilosis was the most frequent yeast species isolated in the third period for this group (p<0.001) (Table 4). In the CLMK group, Fusarium spp. was the most common filamentous species isolated for all three periods, while C. albicans was the most frequent yeast species in the second and third period. However, this difference was not statistically significant.

 

 

Regarding co-infections, cultures showing more than one bacterial strain were the most frequent (53.3%). Cultures exhibiting more than one group of microorganisms (e.g., bacteria, fungi, and Acanthamoeba spp.) were also observed in the second and third periods. Co-infection by bacteria and Acanthamoeba spp. was more frequent (5.7%) than co-infection by bacteria and fungi (1.8%), and by bacteria, Acanthamoeba spp., and fungi (0.1%).

 

DISCUSSION

CL wearing is one of the most important risk factors for MK(7). Considering the large number of CL wearers worldwide and the fact that etiological profiles can vary according to geographical region(17), epidemiological investigations are an important public health tool for the prevention of MK.

The consequences of daily CL wearing were the subject of numerous studies performed in the mid-1990s, in which CLs were shown to be a predisposing risk factor for MK. In the present study, we obtained results regarding the frequency of MK infection related to CL wearing over a 30-year period. Our results were similar to those of a previous study performed at the same healthcare center(18), which showed that the frequency of CLMK increased in the past years. Retrospective and prospective studies have reported a relationship between CLMK frequency and CL type, i.e., soft (extended wear, daily disposable, and cosmetic) vs. rigid (corneal or scleral) lenses(12,15). Despite the fact that the use of soft CLs remains the most important risk factor for the development of Acanthamoeba spp. keratitis, the recommendations for the use and care of scleral CLs should also be emphasized, as the use is not unrestricted from this type of infection(19).

Several studies have reported that males are more commonly afflicted with CLMK than females(20-22). In our study, females were predominant in the CLMK group, whereas males were more frequently found in the entire MK group. Lam (2002) also found a higher frequency of female vs. male CLMK cases(23). It is well known that CL use provides a better appearance and imposes less restrictions on daily activities(24). This may be the reason why our study showed a female predominance among CLMK cases. Most of the patients with CLMK in our study were young adults (19-40 years of age), corresponding to the age group described in other CLMK-related studies(22).

Here, bacteria were the most frequent microorganisms isolated from the samples, followed by fungi and Acanthamoeba spp.. Compared with previous studies performed in other geographical areas, the microorganisms isolated from our samples were different(13,16). In some countries, such as India and Nepal, fungal keratitis is the most frequent type of MK(3,25). Conversely, bacteria are more common in patients with MK in developed countries(10,16). Despite the fact that Brazil is a developing country, Gram-positive bacteria were always the most frequent microorganism isolated(18) in our research center, even when different age ranges were analyzed(26).

In the present study, Acanthamoeba spp. was the second-most frequent type of microorganism isolated from patients with CLMK; this result was similar to that of a previous study conducted in Hong Kong(10). The high incidence of Acanthamoeba spp. detected among the CLMK samples in our study was also expected, as it had been described previously(27). Here, the number of Acanthamoeba spp. positive samples was significantly higher in the CLMK group compared with the total MK sample. Over the 30-year period covered in this study, the requests for Acanthamoeba spp. culture at our healthcare center increased since the first reported case of MK caused by Acanthamoeba spp.(28).

Gram-negative bacilli are commonly isolated from CLMK samples in tropical countries, whereas Gram-positive bacteria are more common in countries with a temperate climate(10). Staphylococcus spp. was the most frequent species in the corneal samples of the NCLMK and CLMK groups in the current study. This was surprising because Brazil is a tropical country; thus, Pseudomonas spp. would be expected to be the most commonly isolated bacteria(14-16). However, its location at the Tropic of Capricorn at a considerable elevation provides a rather subtropical-to-temperate climate to São Paulo. Conversely, Pseudomonas spp. was the major causative agent of bacterial CLMK in our experience (p<0.001).

The results of this study demonstrated that, among patients with MK, fungal infection was less common than bacterial infection; there was one fungal case for every eight bacterial cases. The probable explanation for this finding relies on the level of urbanization of São Paulo, as a higher percentage of fungal MK cases would be expected in rural environments(29). Fusarium spp., Aspergillus spp., and Candida spp. are the most commonly isolated fungi worldwide in cases of corneal infection(30,31). In the present study, we were able to demonstrate a higher frequency of filamentous fungal infection in the MK group from 1987-2016, with Fusarium spp. being the predominant fungal species.

In this study, co-infection by bacteria and Acanthamoeba spp. was more frequent than co-infection by: (i) bacteria and fungi; and (ii) bacteria, Acanthamoeba spp., and fungi. Acanthamoeba spp. keratitis polymicrobial infection is also observed as a secondary infection, with both bacteria and fungi(32,33). Through endosymbiosis, Acanthamoeba spp. may inoculate bacteria, fungi, and viruses into the cornea, in which they cause keratitis(34).

In conclusion, we described the epidemiological profile of MK over the past 30 years at our referral center in São Paulo, Brazil. During this period, CLMK was more frequent among females and young adults. Overall, in contrast to what it is observed in other tropical countries, Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus spp.) were predominant among all corneal samples analyzed. Moreover, in accordance with other studies, Fusarium spp. was the most frequently isolated fungus. Finally, our study was able to significantly correlate CLMK to Pseudomonas spp. and Acanthamoeba spp. infections.

 

REFERENCES

1. Whitcher JP, Srinivasan M, Upadhyay MP.Corneal blindness: a global perspective. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79 (3):214-21.

2. Gupta N, Tandon R, Gupta SK, Sreenivas V, Vashist P.Burden of corneal blindness in India. Indian J Community Med. 2013; 38(4):198-206.

3. Ranjini CY, Waddepally VV. Microbial profile of corneal ulcers in a tertiary care hospital in South India. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016; 11(4):363-7.

4. Pepose JS, Wilhelmus KR.Divergent approaches to the management of corneal ulcers. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;114 (5):630-2.

5. Cariello AJ, Passos RM, Yu MC, Hofling-Lima AL. Microbial keratitis at a referral center in Brazil. Int Ophthalmol. 2011;31(3):197-204.

6. Austin A, Lietman T, Rose-Nussbaumer J. Update on the management of infectious keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(11): 1678-89.

7. Wilhelmus KR. Review of clinical experience with microbial keratitis associated with contact lenses. CLAO J. 1987;13 (4):211-4.

8. Cheng KH, Leung SL, Hoekman HW, Beekhuis WH, Mulder PG, Geerards AJ, et al. Incidence of contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis and its related morbidity. Lancet. 1999;354 (9174):181-5. Comment in: Lancet. 1999;3549174):174-5. Lancet. 2000; 355(9198):143-4.

9. Green M, Apel A, Stapleton F. Risk factors and causative organisms in microbial keratitis. Cornea. 2008;27(1):22-7.

10. Lam DS, Houang E, Fan DS, Lyon D, Seal D, Wong E; Hong Kong Microbial Keratitis Study Group. Incidence and risk factors for microbial keratitis in Hong Kong: comparison with Europe and North America. Eye (Lond). 2002;16(5):608-18.

11. Morgan PB, Efron N, Brennan NA, Hill EA, Raynor MK, Tullo AB. Risk factors for the development of corneal infiltrative events associated with contact lens wear. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(9):3136-43.

12. Stapleton F, Naduvilath T, Keay L, Radford C, Dart J, Edwards K, et al. Risk factors and causative organisms in microbial keratitis in daily disposable contact lens wear. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0181343.

13. Teweldemedhin M, Gebreyesus H, Atsbaha AH, Asgedom SW, Saravanan M. Bacterial profile of ocular infections: A systematic review. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17(1):212.

14. Mah-Sadorra JH, Yavuz SG, Najjar DM, Laibson PR, Rapuano CJ, Cohen EJ. Trends in contact lens-related corneal ulcers. Cornea. 2005;24(1):51-8.

15. Sharma S, Gopalakrishnan S, Aasuri MK, Garg P, Rao GN. Trends in contact lens-associated microbial keratitis in Southern India. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(1):138-43.

16. Konda N, Motukupally SR, Garg P, Sharma S, Ali MH, Willcox MD. Microbial analyses of contact lens-associated microbial keratitis. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91(1):47-53.

17. Stapleton F, Keay L, Edwards K, Naduvilath T, Brian G, Jacobs R.Studies of contact lens-related microbial keratitis in Australia and New Zealand: new learnings. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33(6 Pt 2): 354-7; discussion 62-3.

18. Moriyama AS, Hofling-Lima AL. Contact lens-associated microbial keratitis. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2008;71(6 Suppl):32-6.

19. Sticca MP, Carrijo-Carvalho LC, Silva IM, Vieira LA, Souza LB, Belfort Jr R, et al. Acanthamoeba keratitis in patients wearing scleral contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018;41(3):307-10.

20. Dart JK, Stapleton F, Minassian D. Contact lenses and other risk factors in microbial keratitis. Lancet. 1991;338(8768):650-3. Lancet. 1991;338(8775):1146-7.

21. Poggio EC, Glynn RJ, Schein OD, Seddon JM, Shannon MJ, Scardino VA, et al. The incidence of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily-wear and extended-wear soft contact lenses. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(12):779-83. Comment in: N Engl J Med. 1990;322(1-): 700-1. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(12):824-6.

22. Stapleton F, Keay L, Edwards K, Naduvilath T, Dart JK, Brian G, et al. The incidence of contact lens-related microbial keratitis in Australia. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(10):1655-62.

23. Sauer A, Meyer N, Bourcier T; French Study Group for Contact Lens-Related Microbial K. Risk factors for contact lens-related microbial keratitis: a case-control multicenter study. Eye Contact Lens. 2016;42(3):158-62.

24. Porisch E. Football players’ contrast sensitivity comparison when wearing amber sport-tinted or clear contact lenses. Optometry. 2007;78(5):232-5.

25. Gopinathan U, Garg P, Fernandes M, Sharma S, Athmanathan S, Rao GN.The epidemiological features and laboratory results of fungal keratitis: A 10-year review at a referral eye care center in South India. Cornea. 2002;21(6):555-9.

26. Yu MC, Hofling-Lima AL, Furtado GH. Microbiological and epidemiological study of infectious keratitis in children and adolescents. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2016;79(5):289-93.

27. Alipour F, Khaheshi S, Soleimanzadeh M, Heidarzadeh S, Heydarzadeh S. Contact lens-related complications: a review. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2017;12(2):193-204.

28. Nosé W, Sato EH, Freitas D, Ribeiro M, Foronda A, Kwitko S, et al. Úlcera de córnea por Acanthamoeba: quatro primeiros casos no Brasil. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 1988;51(6):233-6.

29. Hagan M, Wright E, Newman M, Dolin P, Johnson G. Causes of suppurative keratitis in Ghana. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79(11):1024-8.

30. Thomas PA, Kaliamurthy J. Mycotic keratitis: Epidemiology, diagnosis and management. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19(3):210-20.

31. Hofling-Lima AL, Roizenblatt R.Therapeutic contact lens-related bilateral fungal keratitis. CLAO J. 2002;28(3):149-50.

32. Tu EY, Joslin CE, Nijm LM, Feder RS, Jain S, Shoff ME. Polymicrobial keratitis: Acanthamoeba and infectious crystalline keratopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(1):13-9 e2.

33. Buchele ML, Wopereis DB, Casara F, de Macedo JP, Rott MB, Monteiro FB, et al. Contact lens-related polymicrobial keratitis: Acanthamoeba spp. genotype T4 and Candida albicans. Parasitol Res. 2018;117(11):3431-6.

34. Hajialilo E, Rezaeian M, Niyyati M, Pourmand MR, Mohebali M, Norouzi M, et al. Molecular characterization of bacterial, viral and fungal endosymbionts of Acanthamoeba isolates in keratitis patients of Iran. Exp Parasitol. 2019;200:48-54.

Submitted for publication: August 27, 2019.
Accepted for publication: July 23, 2020.

Approved by the following research ethics committee: Universidade Federal de São Paulo (CAAE: 15300319.0.0000.5505).

Funding: This study received no specific financial support.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest: None of the authors have any potential conflicts of interest to disclose.


Dimension

© 2024 - All rights reserved - Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia